EDHL vs EEX

Everbright Digital Holding Limi vs Emerald Holding, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDHL

Advertising Agencies
Everbright Digital Holding Limi
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.10
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EEX

Advertising Agencies
Emerald Holding, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$5.00
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDHL Fair ValueEDHL Upside EEX Fair ValueEEX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.61 -80.3% $2.42 -51.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.38 -84.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $2.92 +19.6% $2.74 -45.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDHL vs EEX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDHL vs EEX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EEX scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs EDHL's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Everbright Digital Holding Limi (EDHL) and Emerald Holding, Inc. (EEX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDHL currently trades at $3.10 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while EEX trades at $5.00 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).