EDF vs EICA

Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I vs Eagle Point Income Company Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDF

Asset Management
Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$5.42
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

EICA

Asset Management
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$24.98
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDF Fair ValueEDF Upside EICA Fair ValueEICA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.43 -73.5% $5.67 -77.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.29 +16.1% $13.24 -46.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDF vs EICA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDF vs EICA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EDF scores higher with a 1.8/10 quality rating vs EICA's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I (EDF) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDF currently trades at $5.42 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while EICA trades at $24.98 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).