EDD vs EDF

EDD vs Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I — Valuation Comparison 2026

EDD

Asset Management
EDD
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
—
—
Price
$5.50
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

EDF

Asset Management
Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
—
—
Price
$5.42
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EDD Fair ValueEDD Upside EDF Fair ValueEDF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.43 -74.0% $1.43 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $5.38 +0.3% $6.29 +16.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EDD vs EDF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EDD vs EDF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EDF scores higher with a 1.8/10 quality rating vs EDD's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing EDD (EDD) and Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I (EDF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EDD currently trades at $5.50 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while EDF trades at $5.42 with a QOC of 1.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).

EDD
View Full EDD Analysis →
EDF
View Full Stone Harbor Emerging Markets I Analysis →