ED vs ENO

Consolidated Edison, Inc. vs Entergy New Orleans, LLC First — Valuation Comparison 2026

ED

Electric & Other Services Combined
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$105.63
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

ENO

Electric & Other Services Combined
Entergy New Orleans, LLC First
Quality
1.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$21.78
Last close
Models
0/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ED Fair ValueED Upside ENO Fair ValueENO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $81.47 -22.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $16.53 -84.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ED vs ENO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ED vs ENO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ED scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs ENO's 1.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and Entergy New Orleans, LLC First (ENO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ED currently trades at $105.63 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while ENO trades at $21.78 with a QOC of 1.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).