ECG vs HOV

Everus Construction Group, Inc. vs Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

ECG

Operative Builders
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$148.77
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

HOV

Operative Builders
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$110.36
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType ECG Fair ValueECG Upside HOV Fair ValueHOV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $51.98 -65.1% $159.01 +44.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.88 -78.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $28.91 -80.6% $68.77 -37.7%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for ECG vs HOV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

ECG vs HOV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ECG scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs HOV's 7.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Everus Construction Group, Inc. (ECG) and Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. (HOV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

ECG currently trades at $148.77 with a QOC of 9.5/10, while HOV trades at $110.36 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).