EAF vs THR

GrafTech International Ltd. vs Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

EAF

Electrical Industrial Apparatus
GrafTech International Ltd.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$9.98
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

THR

Electrical Industrial Apparatus
Thermon Group Holdings, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$61.14
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType EAF Fair ValueEAF Upside THR Fair ValueTHR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $56.39 +465.0% $10.89 -82.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.29 -63.8% $9.65 -84.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for EAF vs THR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

EAF vs THR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

THR scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs EAF's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) and Thermon Group Holdings, Inc. (THR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

EAF currently trades at $9.98 with a QOC of 5.9/10, while THR trades at $61.14 with a QOC of 10.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).