DTI vs GPUS

Drilling Tools International Co vs Hyperscale Data, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DTI

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Drilling Tools International Co
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
42
WARN
Price
$2.78
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

GPUS

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Hyperscale Data, Inc.
Quality
3.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.19
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DTI Fair ValueDTI Upside GPUS Fair ValueGPUS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.72 +69.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.32 +132.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.30 -89.3% $0.34 +78.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $2.93 +5.3% $0.03 -79.4%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DTI vs GPUS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DTI vs GPUS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DTI scores higher with a 5.0/10 quality rating vs GPUS's 3.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Drilling Tools International Co (DTI) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DTI currently trades at $2.78 with a QOC of 5.0/10, while GPUS trades at $0.19 with a QOC of 3.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).