DNA vs DYAI

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. vs Dyadic International, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DNA

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$9.37
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

DYAI

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Dyadic International, Inc.
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.81
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DNA Fair ValueDNA Upside DYAI Fair ValueDYAI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.13 -98.6% $0.24 -69.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.21 -74.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $3.29 -64.9% $0.03 -95.9%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DNA vs DYAI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DNA vs DYAI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DYAI scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs DNA's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (DNA) and Dyadic International, Inc. (DYAI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DNA currently trades at $9.37 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while DYAI trades at $0.81 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).