DHR vs FTV

Danaher Corporation vs Fortive Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

DHR

Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, and Control
Danaher Corporation
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$182.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

FTV

Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, and Control
Fortive Corporation
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$58.32
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DHR Fair ValueDHR Upside FTV Fair ValueFTV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $171.16 -6.3% $30.38 -47.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.92 -88.5% $8.43 -85.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DHR vs FTV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DHR vs FTV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DHR scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs FTV's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Danaher Corporation (DHR) and Fortive Corporation (FTV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DHR currently trades at $182.67 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while FTV trades at $58.32 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).