DGICA vs EG

Donegal Group, Inc. vs Everest Group, Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DGICA

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Donegal Group, Inc.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.97
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EG

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Everest Group, Ltd.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$324.03
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DGICA Fair ValueDGICA Upside EG Fair ValueEG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.42 +8.5% $1824.91 +463.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $24.20 +42.6% $534.48 +64.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DGICA vs EG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DGICA vs EG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EG scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs DGICA's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Donegal Group, Inc. (DGICA) and Everest Group, Ltd. (EG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DGICA currently trades at $16.97 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while EG trades at $324.03 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).