DEA vs DHCNI

Easterly Government Properties, vs Diversified Healthcare Trust - — Valuation Comparison 2026

DEA

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Easterly Government Properties,
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$23.98
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

DHCNI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Diversified Healthcare Trust -
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$18.20
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DEA Fair ValueDEA Upside DHCNI Fair ValueDHCNI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $39.45 +64.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $20.32 -15.2% $1.13 -93.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $0.42 -97.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.28 -98.8% $0.59 -96.8%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DEA vs DHCNI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DEA vs DHCNI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DEA scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs DHCNI's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Easterly Government Properties, (DEA) and Diversified Healthcare Trust - (DHCNI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DEA currently trades at $23.98 with a QOC of 7.9/10, while DHCNI trades at $18.20 with a QOC of 4.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).