DDI vs GAME

DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd vs GameSquare Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DDI

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.74
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

GAME

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
GameSquare Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.1
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$0.41
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DDI Fair ValueDDI Upside GAME Fair ValueGAME Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.75 -68.1% $0.01 -97.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.30 -39.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $1.22 -88.9% $0.12 -70.9%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DDI vs GAME — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DDI vs GAME — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

GAME scores higher with a 5.1/10 quality rating vs DDI's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd (DDI) and GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DDI currently trades at $11.74 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while GAME trades at $0.41 with a QOC of 5.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).