DAIC vs FIS

CID HoldCo, Inc. vs Fidelity National Information S — Valuation Comparison 2026

DAIC

Information Technology Services
CID HoldCo, Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.14
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

FIS

Information Technology Services
Fidelity National Information S
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
32
LOW
Price
$42.22
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DAIC Fair ValueDAIC Upside FIS Fair ValueFIS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $86.30 +104.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.99 -74.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $0.04 -82.4% $18.87 -55.3%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $0.21 +51.0% $58.93 +39.6%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DAIC vs FIS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DAIC vs FIS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FIS scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs DAIC's 4.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CID HoldCo, Inc. (DAIC) and Fidelity National Information S (FIS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DAIC currently trades at $0.14 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while FIS trades at $42.22 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).