DAIC vs EPAM

CID HoldCo, Inc. vs EPAM Systems, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

DAIC

Information Technology Services
CID HoldCo, Inc.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.14
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

EPAM

Information Technology Services
EPAM Systems, Inc.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$101.43
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType DAIC Fair ValueDAIC Upside EPAM Fair ValueEPAM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $203.95 +101.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $94.38 -7.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $0.04 -82.4% $74.95 -26.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $0.21 +51.0% $111.96 +10.4%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for DAIC vs EPAM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

DAIC vs EPAM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EPAM scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs DAIC's 4.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CID HoldCo, Inc. (DAIC) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

DAIC currently trades at $0.14 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while EPAM trades at $101.43 with a QOC of 9.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).