CWD vs DBL

CaliberCos Inc. vs DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit — Valuation Comparison 2026

CWD

Asset Management
CaliberCos Inc.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$0.95
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

DBL

Asset Management
DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.37
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CWD Fair ValueCWD Upside DBL Fair ValueDBL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.14 +4.6% $3.80 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $11.54 -19.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.05 -95.1% $10.90 -24.1%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CWD vs DBL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CWD vs DBL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CWD scores higher with a 4.3/10 quality rating vs DBL's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Credit (DBL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CWD currently trades at $0.95 with a QOC of 4.3/10, while DBL trades at $14.37 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).