CV vs ELMD

CapsoVision, Inc. vs Electromed, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CV

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
CapsoVision, Inc.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.78
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

ELMD

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
Electromed, Inc.
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
22
SAFE
Price
$37.72
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CV Fair ValueCV Upside ELMD Fair ValueELMD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.14 -98.0% $10.80 -71.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.32 -95.7% $8.45 -77.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CV vs ELMD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CV vs ELMD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ELMD scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs CV's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CapsoVision, Inc. (CV) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CV currently trades at $6.78 with a QOC of 5.7/10, while ELMD trades at $37.72 with a QOC of 9.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).