CUPR vs HSCS

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Limit vs HeartSciences Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CUPR

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Limit
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$2.40
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

HSCS

Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies
HeartSciences Inc.
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
28
LOW
Price
$1.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CUPR Fair ValueCUPR Upside HSCS Fair ValueHSCS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.14 -94.1% $1.00 -40.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.36 -31.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.17 -92.8% $0.54 -67.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CUPR vs HSCS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CUPR vs HSCS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CUPR scores higher with a 5.3/10 quality rating vs HSCS's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Limit (CUPR) and HeartSciences Inc. (HSCS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CUPR currently trades at $2.40 with a QOC of 5.3/10, while HSCS trades at $1.67 with a QOC of 4.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).