CUBE vs DEI

CubeSmart vs Douglas Emmett, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CUBE

Real Estate Investment Trusts
CubeSmart
Quality
9.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$40.00
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

DEI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$11.64
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CUBE Fair ValueCUBE Upside DEI Fair ValueDEI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $43.74 +9.4% $8.74 -21.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.66 -73.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $66.14 +65.4% $3.19 -72.6%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CUBE vs DEI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CUBE vs DEI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CUBE scores higher with a 9.7/10 quality rating vs DEI's 6.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CubeSmart (CUBE) and Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CUBE currently trades at $40.00 with a QOC of 9.7/10, while DEI trades at $11.64 with a QOC of 6.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).