Is CSQ or CXH more undervalued in 2026?

CirclFi compares Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal (CXH) using 13 institutional-grade valuation models. CSQ has a Quality of Company score of 2.1/10 while CXH scores 1.7/10.

Which is a better buy — CSQ or CXH?

Compare intrinsic values from 13 independent models against current market prices. CirclFi also calculates Value Trap scores. This is not financial advice — conduct your own analysis.

How do CSQ and CXH valuations compare?

CSQ at $20.57 and CXH at $7.61 are compared across Bayesian DCF, EPV, EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, and 8 additional models.

CSQ vs CXH Valuation Comparison 2026 — Intrinsic Value Analysis

CSQ

Asset Management

Calamos Strategic Total Return

Quality

2.1

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$20.57

Last close

Models

10/13

Active

CXH

Asset Management

MFS Investment Grade Municipal

Quality

1.7

out of 10

Value Trap

—

Price

$7.61

Last close

Models

11/13

Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

Model	Type	CSQ Fair Value	CSQ Upside	CXH Fair Value	CXH Upside
Bayesian DCF	Intrinsic	$6.07	-70.5%	$2.01	-73.5%
Earnings Power Value	Intrinsic	$8.45	-56.5%	—	—
EROIC Spread	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
First Chicago	Scenario	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Markov DDM	Intrinsic	—	—	$3.53	-53.6%
ML-RIV	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Dynamic NAV	Asset-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
PWERM	Option-Based	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
Sentiment SOTP	Hybrid	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
CUCE Ensemble	Ensemble	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
FTNN Topology	Relative	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%
RCMH-DCF	Intrinsic	$•••.••	••.•%	$•••.••	••.•%

🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CSQ vs CXH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CSQ vs CXH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CSQ scores higher with a 2.1/10 quality rating vs CXH's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Calamos Strategic Total Return (CSQ) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal (CXH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CSQ currently trades at $20.57 with a QOC of 2.1/10, while CXH trades at $7.61 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).