CRNT vs KUST

Ceragon Networks Ltd. vs Kustom Entertainment, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRNT

Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment
Ceragon Networks Ltd.
Quality
2.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$2.89
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

KUST

Radio & Tv Broadcasting & Communications Equipment
Kustom Entertainment, Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$3.17
Last close
Models
4/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRNT Fair ValueCRNT Upside KUST Fair ValueKUST Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.49 -82.9% $2.62 -17.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.08 -97.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $2.90 +0.3% $0.61 -80.6%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRNT vs KUST — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRNT vs KUST — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KUST scores higher with a 5.4/10 quality rating vs CRNT's 2.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ceragon Networks Ltd. (CRNT) and Kustom Entertainment, Inc. (KUST) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRNT currently trades at $2.89 with a QOC of 2.7/10, while KUST trades at $3.17 with a QOC of 5.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).