CRCT vs EBON

Cricut, Inc. vs Ebang International Holdings In — Valuation Comparison 2026

CRCT

Computer Hardware
Cricut, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$4.13
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EBON

Computer Hardware
Ebang International Holdings In
Quality
2.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.88
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CRCT Fair ValueCRCT Upside EBON Fair ValueEBON Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.73 +232.4% $0.37 -80.4%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.28 +3.5% $4.25 +72.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CRCT vs EBON — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CRCT vs EBON — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRCT scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs EBON's 2.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Ebang International Holdings In (EBON) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CRCT currently trades at $4.13 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while EBON trades at $1.88 with a QOC of 2.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).