CPSS vs DAVE

Consumer Portfolio Services, In vs Dave Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CPSS

Finance Services
Consumer Portfolio Services, In
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.86
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

DAVE

Finance Services
Dave Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$282.56
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CPSS Fair ValueCPSS Upside DAVE Fair ValueDAVE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $48.94 +396.4% $309.41 +9.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.99 +5.2% $138.53 -51.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CPSS vs DAVE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CPSS vs DAVE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CPSS scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs DAVE's 8.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Consumer Portfolio Services, In (CPSS) and Dave Inc. (DAVE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CPSS currently trades at $9.86 with a QOC of 8.8/10, while DAVE trades at $282.56 with a QOC of 8.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).