COHU vs TER

Cohu, Inc. vs Teradyne, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

COHU

Instruments For Meas & Testing of Electricity & Elec Signals
Cohu, Inc.
Quality
6.7
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$52.75
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

TER

Instruments For Meas & Testing of Electricity & Elec Signals
Teradyne, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$374.31
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType COHU Fair ValueCOHU Upside TER Fair ValueTER Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.83 -64.3% $51.17 -86.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.11 -62.5% $40.85 -89.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for COHU vs TER — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

COHU vs TER — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

TER scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs COHU's 6.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cohu, Inc. (COHU) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

COHU currently trades at $52.75 with a QOC of 6.7/10, while TER trades at $374.31 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).