CLS vs CTS

Celestica, Inc. vs CTS Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CLS

Printed Circuit Boards
Celestica, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$385.39
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CTS

Printed Circuit Boards
CTS Corporation
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$64.21
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CLS Fair ValueCLS Upside CTS Fair ValueCTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $44.51 -88.5% $44.95 -30.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $72.53 -81.2% $27.54 -57.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CLS vs CTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CLS vs CTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CLS scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CTS's 9.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Celestica, Inc. (CLS) and CTS Corporation (CTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CLS currently trades at $385.39 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while CTS trades at $64.21 with a QOC of 9.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).