CLLS vs CRDF

Cellectis S.A. vs Cardiff Oncology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CLLS

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Cellectis S.A.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$3.52
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CRDF

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Cardiff Oncology, Inc.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$1.90
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CLLS Fair ValueCLLS Upside CRDF Fair ValueCRDF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.93 -73.7% $0.57 -70.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.52 -61.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.10 -97.4% $0.06 -96.2%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CLLS vs CRDF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CLLS vs CRDF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CRDF scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs CLLS's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Cardiff Oncology, Inc. (CRDF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CLLS currently trades at $3.52 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while CRDF trades at $1.90 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).