CLB vs KLXE

Core Laboratories Inc. vs KLX Energy Services Holdings, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

CLB

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
Core Laboratories Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

KLXE

Oil & Gas Field Services, NEC
KLX Energy Services Holdings, I
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$2.74
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CLB Fair ValueCLB Upside KLXE Fair ValueKLXE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.20 -76.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.10 -91.9% $18.61 +400.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $4.69 -65.7% $2.25 -17.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CLB vs KLXE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CLB vs KLXE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CLB scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs KLXE's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Core Laboratories Inc. (CLB) and KLX Energy Services Holdings, I (KLXE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CLB currently trades at $13.67 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while KLXE trades at $2.74 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).