CISS vs DHT

C3is Inc. vs DHT Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CISS

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
C3is Inc.
Quality
6.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$2.28
Last close
Models
2/13
Active
VS

DHT

Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight
DHT Holdings, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$16.32
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CISS Fair ValueCISS Upside DHT Fair ValueDHT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $11.17 +389.9% $23.31 +42.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.40 +6.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $10.37 +354.9% $23.24 +42.4%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CISS vs DHT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CISS vs DHT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DHT scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs CISS's 6.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing C3is Inc. (CISS) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CISS currently trades at $2.28 with a QOC of 6.9/10, while DHT trades at $16.32 with a QOC of 9.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).