CHAI vs IHS

Core AI Holdings, Inc. vs IHS Holding Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

CHAI

Radiotelephone Communications
Core AI Holdings, Inc.
Quality
3.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$1.05
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

IHS

Radiotelephone Communications
IHS Holding Limited
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$8.30
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CHAI Fair ValueCHAI Upside IHS Fair ValueIHS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.34 -67.7% $11.39 +37.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $18.76 +126.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $2.49 +136.7% $0.19 -97.6%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CHAI vs IHS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CHAI vs IHS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IHS scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs CHAI's 3.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Core AI Holdings, Inc. (CHAI) and IHS Holding Limited (IHS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CHAI currently trades at $1.05 with a QOC of 3.7/10, while IHS trades at $8.30 with a QOC of 7.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).