CGEN vs CLLS

Compugen Ltd. vs Cellectis S.A. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CGEN

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Compugen Ltd.
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$2.63
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CLLS

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Cellectis S.A.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$3.52
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CGEN Fair ValueCGEN Upside CLLS Fair ValueCLLS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.07 +54.7% $0.93 -73.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.30 +25.6% $1.52 -61.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CGEN vs CLLS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CGEN vs CLLS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CGEN scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs CLLS's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Compugen Ltd. (CGEN) and Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CGEN currently trades at $2.63 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while CLLS trades at $3.52 with a QOC of 2.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).