CGCT vs EMAT

Cartesian Growth Corporation II vs Evolution Metals & Technologies — Valuation Comparison 2026

CGCT

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Cartesian Growth Corporation II
Quality
4.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.53
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

EMAT

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Evolution Metals & Technologies
Quality
4.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$6.75
Last close
Models
7/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CGCT Fair ValueCGCT Upside EMAT Fair ValueEMAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.72 -94.2% $2.31 -65.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.81 -92.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $1.03 -91.7% $17.98 +129.6%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CGCT vs EMAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CGCT vs EMAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CGCT scores higher with a 4.6/10 quality rating vs EMAT's 4.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cartesian Growth Corporation II (CGCT) and Evolution Metals & Technologies (EMAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CGCT currently trades at $12.53 with a QOC of 4.6/10, while EMAT trades at $6.75 with a QOC of 4.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).