CDNL vs FER

Cardinal Infrastructure Group I vs Ferrovial N.V. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CDNL

Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors
Cardinal Infrastructure Group I
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$51.89
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

FER

Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors
Ferrovial N.V.
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$68.01
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CDNL Fair ValueCDNL Upside FER Fair ValueFER Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.63 -69.9% $70.96 +4.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $5.71 -89.0% $26.98 -60.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CDNL vs FER — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CDNL vs FER — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

FER scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs CDNL's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Cardinal Infrastructure Group I (CDNL) and Ferrovial N.V. (FER) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CDNL currently trades at $51.89 with a QOC of 6.5/10, while FER trades at $68.01 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).