CCTG vs LYTS

CCSC Technology International H vs LSI Industries Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CCTG

Electric Lighting & Wiring Equipment
CCSC Technology International H
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.54
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

LYTS

Electric Lighting & Wiring Equipment
LSI Industries Inc.
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
23
SAFE
Price
$24.23
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CCTG Fair ValueCCTG Upside LYTS Fair ValueLYTS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.27 -49.6% $4.11 -83.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.18 -70.6% $4.81 -80.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CCTG vs LYTS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CCTG vs LYTS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LYTS scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs CCTG's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CCSC Technology International H (CCTG) and LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CCTG currently trades at $0.54 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while LYTS trades at $24.23 with a QOC of 9.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).