CCTG vs EAF

CCSC Technology International H vs GrafTech International Ltd. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CCTG

Electrical Equipment & Parts
CCSC Technology International H
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.54
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

EAF

Electrical Equipment & Parts
GrafTech International Ltd.
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$10.00
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CCTG Fair ValueCCTG Upside EAF Fair ValueEAF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.25 -54.3% $55.76 +457.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.18 -70.6% $3.29 -63.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CCTG vs EAF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CCTG vs EAF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

EAF scores higher with a 5.9/10 quality rating vs CCTG's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CCSC Technology International H (CCTG) and GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CCTG currently trades at $0.54 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while EAF trades at $10.00 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).