CARE vs CBU

Carter Bankshares, Inc. vs Community Financial System, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

CARE

National Commercial Banks
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$27.30
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CBU

National Commercial Banks
Community Financial System, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$63.64
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CARE Fair ValueCARE Upside CBU Fair ValueCBU Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.74 -31.4% $26.20 -58.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $63.22 +131.6% $42.98 -32.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CARE vs CBU — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CARE vs CBU — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CARE scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CBU's 8.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) and Community Financial System, Inc (CBU) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CARE currently trades at $27.30 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while CBU trades at $63.64 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).