CARE vs CBFV

Carter Bankshares, Inc. vs CB Financial Services, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CARE

Banks - Regional
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
Quality
10.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$26.97
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CBFV

Banks - Regional
CB Financial Services, Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$35.80
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CARE Fair ValueCARE Upside CBFV Fair ValueCBFV Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.74 -30.5% $15.22 -57.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $63.22 +134.4% $11.54 -67.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CARE vs CBFV — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CARE vs CBFV — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CARE scores higher with a 10.0/10 quality rating vs CBFV's 8.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) and CB Financial Services, Inc. (CBFV) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CARE currently trades at $26.97 with a QOC of 10.0/10, while CBFV trades at $35.80 with a QOC of 8.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).