CAI vs CBIO

Caris Life Sciences, Inc. vs Crescent Biopharma, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CAI

Biotechnology
Caris Life Sciences, Inc.
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$16.67
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CBIO

Biotechnology
Crescent Biopharma, Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$21.47
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CAI Fair ValueCAI Upside CBIO Fair ValueCBIO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.68 -80.1% $8.97 -58.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.21 -82.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $0.60 -96.8% $4.01 -81.3%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CAI vs CBIO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CAI vs CBIO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CAI scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs CBIO's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Caris Life Sciences, Inc. (CAI) and Crescent Biopharma, Inc. (CBIO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CAI currently trades at $16.67 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while CBIO trades at $21.47 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).