CACI vs CLPS

CACI International, Inc. vs CLPS Incorporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

CACI

Information Technology Services
CACI International, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$522.85
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CLPS

Information Technology Services
CLPS Incorporation
Quality
2.1
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$0.88
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CACI Fair ValueCACI Upside CLPS Fair ValueCLPS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $91.48 -82.5% $0.17 -80.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $58.93 -88.7% $0.09 -90.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CACI vs CLPS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CACI vs CLPS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CACI scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs CLPS's 2.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CACI International, Inc. (CACI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CACI currently trades at $522.85 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while CLPS trades at $0.88 with a QOC of 2.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).