CAAS vs DORM

China Automotive Systems, Inc. vs Dorman Products, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

CAAS

Auto Parts
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.66
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

DORM

Auto Parts
Dorman Products, Inc.
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
11
SAFE
Price
$125.05
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CAAS Fair ValueCAAS Upside DORM Fair ValueDORM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $4.57 -96.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $15.84 +240.0% $60.57 -51.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $1.58 -66.1% $78.86 -29.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CAAS vs DORM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CAAS vs DORM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

DORM scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs CAAS's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) and Dorman Products, Inc. (DORM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CAAS currently trades at $4.66 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while DORM trades at $125.05 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).