CAAP vs PAC

Corporacion America Airports SA vs Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacific — Valuation Comparison 2026

CAAP

Airports & Air Services
Corporacion America Airports SA
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$26.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

PAC

Airports & Air Services
Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacific
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$238.11
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType CAAP Fair ValueCAAP Upside PAC Fair ValuePAC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $7.76 -70.5% $67.35 -71.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.17 -55.3% $126.72 -46.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for CAAP vs PAC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

CAAP vs PAC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PAC scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs CAAP's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Corporacion America Airports SA (CAAP) and Grupo Aeroportuario Del Pacific (PAC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

CAAP currently trades at $26.28 with a QOC of 1.9/10, while PAC trades at $238.11 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).