BWA vs CAAS

BorgWarner Inc. vs China Automotive Systems, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BWA

Auto Parts
BorgWarner Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$71.31
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CAAS

Auto Parts
China Automotive Systems, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.66
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BWA Fair ValueBWA Upside CAAS Fair ValueCAAS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $75.65 +6.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $89.03 +24.9% $15.84 +240.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $33.44 -53.1% $1.58 -66.1%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BWA vs CAAS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BWA vs CAAS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BWA scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs CAAS's 8.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) and China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BWA currently trades at $71.31 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while CAAS trades at $4.66 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).