BW vs BWNB

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I vs Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I — Valuation Comparison 2026

BW

Heating Equipment, Except Electric & Warm Air Furnaces
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I
Quality
5.8
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$18.45
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

BWNB

Heating Equipment, Except Electric & Warm Air Furnaces
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$25.06
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BW Fair ValueBW Upside BWNB Fair ValueBWNB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $6.14 -66.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.50 -96.5% $0.48 -98.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $6.36 -65.5% $4.34 -82.7%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BW vs BWNB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BW vs BWNB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BW scores higher with a 5.8/10 quality rating vs BWNB's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BW) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, I (BWNB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BW currently trades at $18.45 with a QOC of 5.8/10, while BWNB trades at $25.06 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).