BURU vs CBAT

Nuburu, Inc. vs CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BURU

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
Nuburu, Inc.
Quality
3.8
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$0.18
Last close
Models
5/13
Active
VS

CBAT

Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment & Supplies
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.80
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BURU Fair ValueBURU Upside CBAT Fair ValueCBAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.04 -87.7% $1.91 +139.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.01 -98.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $0.24 +35.8% $3.76 +369.6%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BURU vs CBAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BURU vs CBAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CBAT scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs BURU's 3.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Nuburu, Inc. (BURU) and CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BURU currently trades at $0.18 with a QOC of 3.8/10, while CBAT trades at $0.80 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).