BSM vs CRC

Black Stone Minerals, L.P. vs California Resources Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

BSM

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
21
SAFE
Price
$13.56
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

CRC

Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas
California Resources Corporatio
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$59.29
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BSM Fair ValueBSM Upside CRC Fair ValueCRC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $15.24 +12.4% $35.06 -40.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.68 -28.6% $43.69 -37.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BSM vs CRC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BSM vs CRC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BSM scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs CRC's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and California Resources Corporatio (CRC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BSM currently trades at $13.56 with a QOC of 8.3/10, while CRC trades at $59.29 with a QOC of 6.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).