BRT vs CBL

BRT Apartments Corp. (MD) vs CBL & Associates Properties, In — Valuation Comparison 2026

BRT

Real Estate Investment Trusts
BRT Apartments Corp. (MD)
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$14.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

CBL

Real Estate Investment Trusts
CBL & Associates Properties, In
Quality
7.5
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$48.09
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BRT Fair ValueBRT Upside CBL Fair ValueCBL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.74 +29.4% $11.92 -75.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.62 -26.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $48.54 +235.0% $29.41 -38.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BRT vs CBL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BRT vs CBL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CBL scores higher with a 7.5/10 quality rating vs BRT's 7.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BRT Apartments Corp. (MD) (BRT) and CBL & Associates Properties, In (CBL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BRT currently trades at $14.49 with a QOC of 7.0/10, while CBL trades at $48.09 with a QOC of 7.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).