BRO vs EQH

Brown & Brown, Inc. vs Equitable Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BRO

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Brown & Brown, Inc.
Quality
9.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$56.25
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

EQH

Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$41.35
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BRO Fair ValueBRO Upside EQH Fair ValueEQH Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $50.39 -10.4% $58.52 +41.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.51 -86.6% $41.79 -0.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BRO vs EQH — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BRO vs EQH — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BRO scores higher with a 9.2/10 quality rating vs EQH's 6.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) and Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BRO currently trades at $56.25 with a QOC of 9.2/10, while EQH trades at $41.35 with a QOC of 6.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).