BPYPN vs CIGI

Brookfield Property Partners L. vs Colliers International Group In — Valuation Comparison 2026

BPYPN

Real Estate
Brookfield Property Partners L.
Quality
4.8
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$13.90
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CIGI

Real Estate
Colliers International Group In
Quality
1.9
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$94.36
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BPYPN Fair ValueBPYPN Upside CIGI Fair ValueCIGI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.89 -0.6% $21.10 -77.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.36 -54.5% $48.42 -51.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BPYPN vs CIGI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BPYPN vs CIGI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BPYPN scores higher with a 4.8/10 quality rating vs CIGI's 1.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Brookfield Property Partners L. (BPYPN) and Colliers International Group In (CIGI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BPYPN currently trades at $13.90 with a QOC of 4.8/10, while CIGI trades at $94.36 with a QOC of 1.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).