BLX vs BSAC

Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc vs Banco Santander - Chile — Valuation Comparison 2026

BLX

Commercial Banks, NEC
Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$55.84
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BSAC

Commercial Banks, NEC
Banco Santander - Chile
Quality
3.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$31.93
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BLX Fair ValueBLX Upside BSAC Fair ValueBSAC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.10 -71.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $23.36 -58.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $179.68 +221.8% $166.85 +446.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $9.69 -69.7%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BLX vs BSAC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BLX vs BSAC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BSAC scores higher with a 3.8/10 quality rating vs BLX's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc (BLX) and Banco Santander - Chile (BSAC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BLX currently trades at $55.84 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while BSAC trades at $31.93 with a QOC of 3.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).