BLX vs BOTJ

Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc vs Bank of the James Financial Gro — Valuation Comparison 2026

BLX

Banks - Regional
Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$56.95
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

BOTJ

Banks - Regional
Bank of the James Financial Gro
Quality
9.5
out of 10
Value Trap
15
SAFE
Price
$22.86
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BLX Fair ValueBLX Upside BOTJ Fair ValueBOTJ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.81 -70.5% $24.94 +9.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $23.36 -58.6% $39.02 +70.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BLX vs BOTJ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BLX vs BOTJ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BOTJ scores higher with a 9.5/10 quality rating vs BLX's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Banco Latinoamericano de Comerc (BLX) and Bank of the James Financial Gro (BOTJ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BLX currently trades at $56.95 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while BOTJ trades at $22.86 with a QOC of 9.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).