BLFS vs EDAP

BioLife Solutions, Inc. vs EDAP TMS S.A. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BLFS

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
BioLife Solutions, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
19
SAFE
Price
$24.92
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

EDAP

Electromedical & Electrotherapeutic Apparatus
EDAP TMS S.A.
Quality
3.1
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$4.32
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BLFS Fair ValueBLFS Upside EDAP Fair ValueEDAP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.87 -88.5% $0.85 -80.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.00 -85.9% $2.40 -30.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BLFS vs EDAP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BLFS vs EDAP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

BLFS scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs EDAP's 3.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing BioLife Solutions, Inc. (BLFS) and EDAP TMS S.A. (EDAP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BLFS currently trades at $24.92 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while EDAP trades at $4.32 with a QOC of 3.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).