BLDP vs CBAT

Ballard Power Systems, Inc. vs CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

BLDP

Electrical Equipment & Parts
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.19
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

CBAT

Electrical Equipment & Parts
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$0.82
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType BLDP Fair ValueBLDP Upside CBAT Fair ValueCBAT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.64 -73.5% $1.87 +128.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.31 -61.3% $0.01 -98.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for BLDP vs CBAT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

BLDP vs CBAT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

CBAT scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs BLDP's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Ballard Power Systems, Inc. (BLDP) and CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

BLDP currently trades at $6.19 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while CBAT trades at $0.82 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).